<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Results of my openSUSE Positioning Suggestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reverendted.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/results-of-my-opensuse-positioning-suggestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reverendted.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/results-of-my-opensuse-positioning-suggestion/</link>
	<description>Also known as "Reverend Ted's Blog"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: secretstash</title>
		<link>http://reverendted.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/results-of-my-opensuse-positioning-suggestion/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>secretstash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://reverendted.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/results-of-my-opensuse-positioning-suggestion/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Hi. I've been looking at your blog and I think you have a very good chance of getting listed at our blog directory, "High Class Blogs." 

I encourage you to submit your site at approvals@highclassblogs.com as 
soon as you can. Not only do I think your blog will be approved, I think you have a good chance of winning an award if you choose to 
nominate yourself. 

Check out the directory at 
http://www.highclassblogs.com and then send along the following 
information to:

approvals@highclassblogs.com

1) Blog Title
2) Blog Url
3) Blog Description

If you put "endorsed by Steve" in the subject line I can all but guarantee you will be approved and your blog will be listed.

Regards,

Steve Davidson
High Class Blogs
www.highclassblogs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I&#8217;ve been looking at your blog and I think you have a very good chance of getting listed at our blog directory, &#8220;High Class Blogs.&#8221; </p>
<p>I encourage you to submit your site at <a href="mailto:approvals@highclassblogs.com">approvals@highclassblogs.com</a> as<br />
soon as you can. Not only do I think your blog will be approved, I think you have a good chance of winning an award if you choose to<br />
nominate yourself. </p>
<p>Check out the directory at<br />
<a href="http://www.highclassblogs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.highclassblogs.com</a> and then send along the following<br />
information to:</p>
<p><a href="mailto:approvals@highclassblogs.com">approvals@highclassblogs.com</a></p>
<p>1) Blog Title<br />
2) Blog Url<br />
3) Blog Description</p>
<p>If you put &#8220;endorsed by Steve&#8221; in the subject line I can all but guarantee you will be approved and your blog will be listed.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Steve Davidson<br />
High Class Blogs<br />
<a href="http://www.highclassblogs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.highclassblogs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamds governor</title>
		<link>http://reverendted.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/results-of-my-opensuse-positioning-suggestion/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>jamds governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://reverendted.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/results-of-my-opensuse-positioning-suggestion/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>"most usable" - in what terms? in whose terms?

i am not just throwing stones. i am just not sure that SuSE useability is number one. there are easier to use distros out there. 

do you mean most application support? redhat might even shade that.

so good intentions are good intentions but that useable claim strikes me as questionable.

if it becomes truly useable we will see more PC deployments, no? 

or did you mean server/

hmmm... lots of questions, it seems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;most usable&#8221; - in what terms? in whose terms?</p>
<p>i am not just throwing stones. i am just not sure that SuSE useability is number one. there are easier to use distros out there. </p>
<p>do you mean most application support? redhat might even shade that.</p>
<p>so good intentions are good intentions but that useable claim strikes me as questionable.</p>
<p>if it becomes truly useable we will see more PC deployments, no? </p>
<p>or did you mean server/</p>
<p>hmmm&#8230; lots of questions, it seems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
